Cases 1 - 10 of 983
Johnson v. San Mateo County
as 3:2024cv01905
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
San Mateo County
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2321 Plant Variety Protection Act
Nunes v. Johnson
as 24-766
Petitioner:
CARLSON NUNES
Respondent:
JAMES JOHNSON, Supt; Green Haven Correctional Facility
Estate of Richard Johnson et al v. Alight Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02184
Plaintiff:
Estate of Richard Johnson and James Johnson
Defendant:
Alight Solutions, LLC, Metlife Services and Solutions, LLC, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Estate of Richard Johnson et al v. Alight Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02106
Plaintiff:
Estate of Richard Johnson and James Johnson
Defendant:
Alight Solutions, LLC, Metlife Services and Solutions, LLC, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. San Mateo County
as 3:2024cv01545
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
San Mateo County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00585
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
