Cases 1 - 10 of 100
(PC) Johnson v. Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2026cv02294
Plaintiff:
Joe James Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department and Lindsay McKee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Stanislaus County et al
as 2:2026cv02205
Plaintiff:
Joe James Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Stanislaus County, Lindsay McKee, Casey Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Allen County Criminal Division et al
as 3:2026cv00840
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Allen County Criminal Division, Francis Gull, David Zent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wise et al v. Allen County Criminal Division et al
as 3:2026cv00800
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hakeam Jabbar Wise, Mark A Maxwell, Jr, Nicholas D Thomas and others
Defendant:
Allen County Criminal Division, Francis Gull, David Zent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crane v. Johnson et al
as 3:2026cv01489
Plaintiff:
Alex Crane
Defendant:
James Johnson, William Hare, Flower Mound Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 5:2026cv00130
Plaintiff:
Marquita Johnson and James Johnson
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
JOHNSON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv01938
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Manship v. Johnson et al
as 3:2026cv00024
Plaintiff:
James Renwick Manship
Defendant:
Michael James Johnson and Eugene Vindman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Johnson v. TDCJ Parole Board
as 3:2025cv03511
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
TDCJ Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.