Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Roe v. Hill
as 4:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
Jackson Roe
Defendant:
James French Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
James Hill v. United States
as 23-2534
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Flaherty Hill
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Smith v. Hill
as 0:2022cv02927
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. USA
as 0:2022cv02853
Petitioner:
James Flaherty Hill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States v. James Flaherty Hill
as 20-1536
Defendant / Appellant:
James Flaherty Hill
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
LaWayne Natt v. Calvin Ford, et al
as 19-2200
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Morris, Grimes Unit, Jerry Howard, Sergeant, Grimes Unit, James A. Hill, Sergeant, Grimes Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LaWayne Natt
Natt v. Ford et al
as 1:2018cv00095
Defendant:
James A Hill, Calvin Ford, Michael Whately and others
Plaintiff:
LaWayne Natt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce Farms Partnership et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 1:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
Bruce Farms Partnership , Ronnie Bruce , Karen Bruce and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , BASF SE, BASF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: DICAMBA HERBICIDES LITIGATION
as 1:2018md02820
Defendant:
DICAMBA HERBICIDES LITIGATION, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company,, Monsanto Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Delaney, Qualls Land Co., Kemp Farms and others
Special Master:
John S. Hahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv02338
Plaintiff:
Barbara D. Hill and James P. Hill
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
