Cases 21 - 30 of 783
TATUM v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TATUM
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, METROPOLITAN POLICE, DANIEL THAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
James Michael Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WHITE v. BAGSHAW et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA CHARITY WHITE
Defendant:
JASON BAGSHAW, NEIL MCALLISTER and JAMES MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VARGO v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
DERRICK VARGO
Defendant:
BRYANT WILLIAMS and JAMES MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. West et al
as 4:2023cv01030
Plaintiff:
James Steven Johnson
Defendant:
Shane West, Darrell Elkin, Mike Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Ortiz
as 1:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Mr. James Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Ms. Rosa Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fenelon et al v. Housing & Urban Development et al
as 5:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L Fenelon and Barbara Fenelon Jackson
Defendant:
U S Dept of Housing & Urban Development, U S Dept of Justice, James Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meier v. Aspen Academy et al
as 1:2023cv02637
Plaintiff:
Katharina Katja Isabel Meier and Katharina (I) Katja Isabel Meier
Defendant:
Aspen Academy, Suzanne (I) Goodspeed, Suzanne Goodspeed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fenelon et al v. Housing & Urban Development et al
as 6:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L Fenelon and Barbara Fenelon Jackson
Defendant:
U S Dept of Housing & Urban Development, U S Dept of Justice, James Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. James Johnson
as 23-2977
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES LAMONT JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
