Cases 11 - 20 of 248
Young et al v. Midland Mortgage
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
James C. Young and Tahnee R. Young
Defendant:
Midland Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 710 et al v. Ford et al
as 1:2023cv04143
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Teamster Local 710, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority and International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 710
Defendant:
Robert B Ford, Hubert L. Allen, Robert J. Alpern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Young v. USA
as 6:2023cv06266
Petitioner:
James Oliver Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Young #092391 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
James Young and James E Young
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Pollitt
as 5:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
James Darrnell Young, Sr
Defendant:
M Pollitt and Brandy Nicole Crockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Young
as 22-11098
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
James Edward Young
Young v. Monroe County et al
as 6:2022cv06471
Plaintiff:
James O. Young
Defendant:
Monroe County, Todd Baxter, Jail Sgt. Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young (ID 49196) v. Walsh
as 5:2022cv03231
Plaintiff:
James Harold Young
Defendant:
Robert Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. James Young
as 22-13106
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES R. YOUNG
Young v. US Probation Office et al
as 6:2022cv06382
Plaintiff:
James O. Young
Defendant:
US Probation Office, Officer Jessica Rider, Chief Officer Timothy Englerth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
