Cases 1 - 10 of 13
US v. James Cox, Jr.
as 17-7162
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES CHARLES COX, JR.
COX v. USA
as 1:2017cv00790
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JAMES CHARLES COX, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. James Cox
as 17-4090
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES MONROE COX
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, et al v. THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al
as 1:2016cv01274
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS , A. GRANT WHITNEY, JR. , RHONDA K. AMOROSO and others
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP , MOORE COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP , JAMES EDWARD ARTHUR, SR. and others
Interested_party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
Peterson et al v Heartland Express, Inc. of Iowa, et al
as 1:2016cv03213
Plaintiff:
Christian Peterson , Eric W. Peterson and Michael C. Peterson
Defendant:
Heartland Express Inc. of Iowa, Heartland Express, Inc., Heartland Express Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX v. USA
as 1:2016cv00946
Petitioner:
JAMES CHARLES COX, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Myers v. Cox et al
as 8:2015cv03539
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Wilson Myers
Defendant:
James M. Cox and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cox v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00909
Plaintiff:
James E. Cox
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv25221
Plaintiff:
Shelia M. Cox and James G. Cox
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Lawrence Transportation Systems, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00116
Plaintiff:
James W. Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
Lawrence Transportation Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
