Cases 31 - 40 of 134
United States v. James Ward
as 20-1091
Defendant / Appellant:
James Allen Ward
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Ward #614839 v. Sprader
as 2:2019cv00079
Respondent:
Scott Sprader
Petitioner:
James Virgil Ward #614839, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ward v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00930
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
James M. Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ward v. Stamps et al
as 2:2018cv00113
Defendant:
Maurita Jenness, Jane Doe, Corizon Medical Health Care System and others
Plaintiff:
James Robert Ward, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2018cv00119
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Ward
Defendant:
John Wilcher, Couniban, Tillman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hensley, et. al. v. Conner, et. al. (PLR1)
as 3:2018cv00173
Thirdparty_defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority , Beverly Seaton, Elmer Seaton and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Hensley
Defendant:
Timothy Conner, Debra Conner, Ed Housley and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Ed Housley and Sherri Housley
Counter_defendant:
Scott Hensley
Cross_defendant:
Timothy Conner, Debra Conner, Ed Housley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
James Ward v. Michael Martel
as 18-55369
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES V. WARD
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL F. MARTEL
Ward v. Ste. Genevieve Sheriff Medical Staff et al
as 1:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
James Robert Ward
Defendant:
Ste. Genevieve Sheriff Medical Staff, Ste. Genevieve Sheriff Jail Staff, Jason Michael Emmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Ste. Genevieve County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2017cv00173
Plaintiff:
James Robert Ward
Defendant:
Ste. Genevieve County Sheriff's Department and Gary J. Stolzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
