Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Bennett v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
James Bennett
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Pamela Bennett v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 21-2352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAMELA BENNETT and JAMES BENNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and DOES 1-15
Bennett et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 3:2020cv00244
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
James Bennett and Pamela Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Waller, Jr. v. Frank Perry
as 15-7657
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES BENNETT WALLER, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK PERRY
WALLER v. PERRY
as 1:2014cv00763
Petitioner:
JAMES BENNETT WALLER, JR.
Respondent:
FRANK PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bennett et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16449
Plaintiff:
Jean E. Bennett and James Bennett
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City National Bank v. Bennett et al
as 3:2011cv00846
Plaintiff:
City National Bank
Defendant:
James Bennett , Timothy L. Mullins , Reade DeCurtins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bio-Medical Applications of South Carolina Inc v. Wateree Community Actions Inc et al
as 3:2011cv00499
Plaintiff:
Bio-Medical Applications of South Carolina Inc
Defendant:
Wateree Community Actions Inc , Klais & Company Inc , Woodard Insurance Agency LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Parkridge 6, LLC v. US Dept. of Transportation
as 10-1443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PARKRIDGE 6, LLC and DULLES CORRIDOR USERS GROUP
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RAY H. LAHOOD, Secretary of Transportation, PETER M. ROGOFF, Administrator, Federal Transit Administration and others
Manuel Pena v. Jeffrey Porter
as 10-1331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL PENA
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY RAY PORTER, JAMES BENNETT BARBOUR, JASON GLENN BARNES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
