Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Brooks v. Cain et al
as 2:2018cv02033
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Greg James Brooks
Defendant:
J. Beaumont, Monica Landaverde, Michael Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00564
Defendant:
"John Doe", "John Doe", "John Doe" and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Greg James Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dewayne Moore v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 16-3977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEWAYNE MOORE, a/k/a JAMES BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, LORINDA WINFIELD, DSFM and others
Brooks v. Daniels et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00648
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Brooks
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels , Luther Strange and Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Ken Fries
as 1:2014cv00246
Plaintiff:
James Brooks
Defendant:
Ken Fries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Dillard
as 2:2012cv01403
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Brooks
Defendant:
Cynthia Dillard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. USA
as 5:2012cv00078
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Brooks Hawkins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maurice Dunbar v. James Mett
as 11-6716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE DUNBAR
Plaintiff:
REGINALD C. MACK, LLOYD BENNETT, TERENCE HAYES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES METTS, in charge of Lexington County Detention Center and CITY COUNCIL, or Person Oursee of the Courts
Jesse Brooks v. Det. Scott, et al
as 11-35068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE JAMES BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
DET. SCOTT, in his individual and official capacity, KING COUNTY ADULT AND JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER, PRISONER TRANSPORT SERVICE and others
Jesse Brooks v. King County Adult and Juvenile, et al
as 10-35755
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE JAMES BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
KING COUNTY ADULT AND JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER, DETECTIVE SCOTT, in his individual and official capacity, PRISONER TRANSPORT SERVICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
