Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Dunbar et al v. Mack et al
as 8:2010cv01775
Plaintiff: Maurice Dunbar, Reginald C Mack, Lloyd Bennett and others
Defendant: James Metts and City Council
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. AUSTIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv05773
Plaintiff: JAMES BROOKS
Defendant: AUSTIN and WEAVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Brooks v. Detective Scott, et al
as 09-35746
Plaintiff - Appellant: JESSE JAMES BROOKS
Defendant: DETECTIVE SCOTT, in his individual and official capacity, KING COUNTY ADULT AND JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER, PRISONER TRANSPORT SERVICE and others
Brooks v. Scott et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00758
Plaintiff: Jesse James Brooks
Defendant: Det. Scott, King County Adult & Juvenile Detention Facility and Prisoner Transport Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Scott et al
as 2:2009cv00427
Plaintiff: Jesse James Brooks
Defendant: Scott, King County Adult & Juvenile Detention Facility and Prisoner Transport Service
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Corbett et al v. Hamblen County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2008cv00330
Plaintiff: William D Corbett and Carolyn S Corbett
Defendant: Hamblen County, Tennessee, Hamblen County Commission, Esco R Jarnigan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. David Grigg
as 08-2726
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID M. GRIGGS, also known as David Briggs also known as David Greggs also known as James Brook also known as David Drummond
BROOKS v. GAINESVILLE SALVATION ARMY, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00042
Plaintiff: RUFUS JAMES BROOKS, JR
Defendant: CITY OF GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA and GAINESVILLE SALVATION ARMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?