Cases 51 - 59 of 59
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Ohlberg et al
as 1:2010cv02603
Plaintiff:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Ryan James Ohlberg, Steven Allen Ohlberg and James Burton Hakert
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 1965
Nagurski v. City of Albuquerque et al
as 1:2010cv00581
Plaintiff:
Jericho Nagurski
Defendant:
City of Albuquerque , James Burton and Gustavo A. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burton v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2010cv00245
Plaintiff:
Fred James Burton
Defendant:
Indiana State of and Judge Chamblee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Burton et al
as 5:2008cv00374
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Burton and Unknown Spouse of James Burton
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
BEARD et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2008cv79841
Plaintiff:
JAMES BURTON BEARD and PAIGE M BEARD
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Beard et al v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 0:2008cv00967
Plaintiff:
James Burton Beard and Paige M Beard
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Burton v. Muscogee County Jail
as 4:2008cv00028
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Burton
Defendant:
Muscogee County Jail and Medical Department Staff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Burton v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv00121
Petitioner:
James Burton and James Burton
Respondent:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Burton v. USA
as 1:2007cv03383
Respondent:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Petitioner:
James Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
