Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Melissa George v. City of Winchester, TN
as 23-5109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELISSA E. GEORGE, Surviving mother and next of kin to
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WINCHESTER, TN and JAMES C. BISHOP, in his individual and official capacities
Melissa George v. City of Winchester, TN, et al
as 22-6092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELISSA E. GEORGE, Surviving mother and next of kin to Deceased Johnny A. Baldwin
Defendant:
CITY OF WINCHESTER, TN
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT JAMES C. BISHOP, in his individual and official capacities
George v. City of Winchester et al (TV1)
as 4:2020cv00026
Defendant:
City of Winchester, Tennessee, ind & official cap James C. Bishop, Sergeant James C. Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
Next of Kin Melissa E. George and Melissa E. George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James C. Bishop v. A.o. Smith, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-78491
Plaintiff:
James C. Bishop
Defendant:
A.o. Smith
IN RE: Panacryl Sutures Products Liability Litigation v.
as 5:2008md01959
Plaintiff:
James C. Bishop, Betty Ann Bishop, Christine L. Bledy and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems Inc., Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bishop et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2008cv00413
Plaintiff:
James C Bishop and Betty Ann Bishop
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems Inc, Ethicon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BISHOP v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71047
Plaintiff:
JAMES C BISHOP
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bishop et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2007cv00098
Plaintiff:
James C Bishop, James C Bishop, Betty Ann Bishop and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems Inc, Ethicon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
