Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Christopher Lumpkin v. Virginia Attorney General
as 24-6258
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE LUMPKIN
Defendant:
VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, KEN JAMES BALDASSARI, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, JAMES C. MARTIN, Attorney and others
Christopher Lumpkin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6142
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE LUMPKIN
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir., Virginia Department of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Dir., Virginia Department of Corrections, VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Lumpkin v. Virginia Attorney General et al
as 3:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Virginia Attorney General, Ken Baldassari, James C. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Virginia Attorney General, Ken Baldassari and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Whitaker v. Martin
as 3:2020cv00024
Plaintiff:
David A Whitaker
Defendant:
James C Martin and James Clevenger Martin Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Duckworth #117491 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv01266
Plaintiff:
Gary Duckworth
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Daniel A Barker, Rollin J Stinely, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. SSA
as 7:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
James C. Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Southwest Funding, L.P. et al
as 3:2013cv04610
Plaintiff:
James C Martin
Defendant:
Southwest Funding, L.P. and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
