Cases 41 - 50 of 232
Campbell v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd. et al
as 1:2020cv00327
Plaintiff:
James Campbell
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd. and Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Dennis et al
as 3:2020cv00128
Defendant:
Randall K Stewart, Bryan Keith Griffin, Pam Haynesworth and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Alexander Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baloga et al v. Maxwell et al
as 8:2019cv02936
Defendant:
Ronald L. Clark, Lawrence W. Maxwell, Mark E. Schreiber and others
Plaintiff:
Katherine Wimer, Jane Petersen, Robert Tattersall and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02287
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CAMPBELL v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv03178
Plaintiff:
JAMES CAMPBELL
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Campbell et al v. City of Rochester, et al
as 0:2019cv01846
Plaintiff:
James Campbell and Sarah Louisell
Defendant:
Rochester Economic Development Authority and City of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Lynn v. Brown, et al
as 19-5063
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOES, sued as John Does 1-100, THEODORE RIESLING, an individual a/k/a Ted, KIMBERLY BIEDLER SCHUTZ, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSEMARY ANN LYNN
Lynn v. Brown et al
as 4:2019cv00332
Defendant:
Purview Life Tulsa, Theodore Riesling, Phillip Feist and others
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Ann Lynn
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Adam et al v. Tighe et al.
as 1:2019cv05664
Plaintiff:
James H. Paylor, Jr., Anissa Frucci, Kenneth Riley and others
Defendant:
GCT New York LP and James Tighe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
JAMES CAMPBELL COMPANY LLC v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 1:2019cv00993
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
JAMES CAMPBELL COMPANY LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
