Cases 1 - 10 of 163
John Doe, et al v. City of Boston, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant:
BOSTON, MA, PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually and others
SAMPEY v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE et al
as 2:2024cv05691
Plaintiff:
AMANDA SAMPEY
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE, TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Chief of Police JAMES ABBOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
La Union Del Pueblo Entero et al v. Abbott et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
La Union Del Pueblo Entero, Sarah Doe, Mary Doe and others
Defendant:
Gregory Abbott, Steven McCraw, Warren K. Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VOE et al v. MANSFIELD et al
as 1:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
VICTOR VOE, VANESSA VOE, VANCE VOE and others
Defendant:
THOMAS MANSFIELD, MICHAUX R. KILPATRICK, MD, PHD, CHRISTINE M. KHANDELWAL, DO and others
Intervenor Defendant:
PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Wheeler v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv12008
Plaintiff:
Wendel Wheeler
Defendant:
Bob Doe, J. Lemieux, James Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Defendant:
LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT, GREGORY SCHOOL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae:
MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16026
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant:
THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae:
MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
L. W., et al v. Jonathan Skrmetti, et al
as 23-5600
Plaintiff / Appellee:
L. W., by and through her parents and next friends, Samantha Williams and Brian Williams, SAMANTHA WILLIAMS, BRIAN WILLIAMS and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN THOMAS SKRMETTI, in his official capacity as the Tennessee Attorney General and Reporter, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RALPH ALVARADO, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Health and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
