Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Williams v. Chambers et al
as 1:2022cv04509
Plaintiff:
Mrs. James E. Williams
Defendant:
Warden Chambers, Deputy Warden Crawford, Well Path Medical Group Health System Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv04510
Plaintiff:
Mrs. James E. Williams, Emma Williams and Jerome Huages
Defendant:
Johnson State Prison, Warden Crawford, Warden Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Johnson State Prison et al
as 1:2022cv04511
Plaintiff:
Mrs. James E. Williams
Defendant:
Johnson State Prison, Warden Deputy Crawford, Warden Chambers M. Acrdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Cobb County Superior Courthouse
as 1:2020cv04963
Defendant:
Cobb County Superior Courthouse
Plaintiff:
James E. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toney v. Medford Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv01318
Defendant:
James E. Williams, Medford Police Department and Cory Schwab
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Toney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knop v. Gordy et al
as 5:2016cv01356
Plaintiff:
Marshall Cois Knop
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, James E Williams, Jefferson S Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knop v. Gordy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00668
Plaintiff:
Marshall Cois Knop
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, James E. Williams, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hill
as 1:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
James E Williams
Defendant:
James A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Williams et al
as 5:2013cv04820
Defendant:
James E. Williams and R. Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Williams v. Charles McClelland, et al
as 11-20562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES A MCCLELLAND, PAT LYKOS, ADRIAN GARCIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
