Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Bailey et al v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC et al
as 3:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Bailey , All Plaintiffs, James M. Brown and others
Defendant:
John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC , All Defendants, John M. O'Quinn & Associates L.L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROWN v. USA
as 1:2013cv00661
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brown et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as 2:2013cv00412
Plaintiff:
James M Brown and Beverly Brown
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brown v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2012cv05172
Plaintiff:
James M. Brown
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BROWN v. ASTRUE
as 3:2012cv00007
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. BROWN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wilkinson et al v. Brown et al
as 6:2009cv00363
Plaintiff:
Hubert Wilkinson and Randall J. Gilbreath
Defendant:
James M. Brown, Sr., Clinton Johnson, Richard L. Dugger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board et al
as 5:2009cv00618
Petitioner:
Carneil Davis
Respondent:
Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, J D Daniels, Susan B Loving and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis, et al v. Brown, et al
as 09-6115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL ELLIS, LARRY CHANEY, ROY GENE EASTERWOOD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. BROWN, SR., Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, CLINTON JOHNSON, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, RICHARD DUGGER, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
