Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Whitt v. Andrews
as 5:2017hc02142
Petitioner: James Matthew Whitt
Respondent: J.F. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US v. James Matthew Greer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-4277
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES MATTHEW GREER
James Matthews v. Levern Cohen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-7628
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES MATTHEWS
Respondent - Appellee: LEVERN COHEN, Warden
MCCORMICK v. PETERKIN
as 1:2015cv00657
Plaintiff: JAMES MATTHEW MCCORMICK, JR.
Defendant: HUBERT A. PETERKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilley v. Clark
as 1:2015cv00591
Petitioner: James Matthew Gilley
Respondent: Harold Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Creecy et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00204
Plaintiff: Alisha Creecy and James Matthew Creecy
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthews v. Cohen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv04538
Petitioner: James Matthews
Respondent: Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Georgino et al v. Murrells Inlet Epiphany Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02879
Plaintiff: Mary Hope Georgino and S G
Defendant: Murrells Inlet Epiphany Inc, James Matthew Brittain and Epiphany
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Matthews v. Simpson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv03669
Plaintiff: Robert James Matthews
Defendant: Cosey Simpson and Bobby Shearin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv02306
Plaintiff: James H Davis
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Corrections, Warden Cohen, Sgt Smalls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?