Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Nelson v. Cox
as 4:2020cv04199
Respondent:
J.W. Cox
Petitioner:
Nicholas James Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kershaw et al v. Governers Office et al
as 1:2020cv03502
Plaintiff:
Tyler James Nelson and Kem Fredrick Kershaw
Defendant:
Governers Office, Sherriffs Office and Mayors Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA AT THE CAPITOL et al
as 1:2020cv02365
Plaintiff:
JAMES NELSON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA AT THE CAPITOL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, FLORIDA STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00221
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael James Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(PC) Nelson v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2019cv02260
Defendant:
Francine Tournour, Lilia Alonso, James Harrington and others
Plaintiff:
James Nelson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Nelson v. City of Sacramento, et al.
as 2:2019cv01841
Plaintiff:
James Nelson and James Nelson, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Francine Tournour, Lilia Alonso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELSON v. FLORIDA STATE PRISON et al
as 4:2019cv00082
Plaintiff:
JAMES NELSON
Defendant:
ADAMS, LINSEY, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jean-Louis v. Mayor City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv09328
Defendant:
Mayor City of New York and Police City of New York
Plaintiff:
Mr. James Nelson and Joseph W. Jean-Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nelson v. Mirandy
as 2:2018cv00601
Petitioner:
Jesse James Nelson
Respondent:
Patrick A. Mirandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. State of West Virginia
as 2:2018cv00970
Petitioner:
Jesse James Nelson
Respondent:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
