Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Emanuel Displaced Persons Association 2 et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01896
Defendant:
Prosper Portland, City of Portland, Portland Development Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Displaced Persons Association 2, Gloria Campbell-Cash, Isaac Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dennis Smith, Sr. v. Calvin Arnett, et al
as 22-2713
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dennis James Smith, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Calvin Arnett, Et al., Dexter Payne, Head Director, Vickey Haycox, Head Director and others
Smith v. Arnett, et al
as 2:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Smith, Sr
Defendant:
Calvin Arnett, Dexter Payne, Vickey Haycox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Arnett, et al
as 5:2022cv05092
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Calvin Arnett, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv00688
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
James Smith, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH SR. v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv45343
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH SR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Smith v. McGinnis Estates Homeowners Association
as 6:2011cv03135
Plaintiff:
Samuel James Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
McGinnis Estates Homeowners Association
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
SMITH v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72638
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH, SR.
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Barnes
as 5:2009cv00307
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Smith, Sr, Eddie Smith, Sr, Jane Doe and others
Defendant:
George Edward Barnes, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
