Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Wynn et al v. Wixom, City of et al
as 2:2011cv12248
Plaintiff:
Ledtha Wynn and John Wynn
Defendant:
Wixom, City of and James Watt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jason Watt
as 10-41083
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JASON JAMES WATTS, also known as Popcorn
Watts v. Allen et al
as 5:2010cv00118
Plaintiff:
Albert James Watts
Defendant:
M. C. Allen and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardwick v. US, et al
as 5:1979cv01710
Plaintiff:
Tillie Hardwick, Joseph Myers, Smith Williams and others
Defendant:
USA, Cecil Andrus, Forrest Gerard and others
Miscellaneou:
City of Elk Grove, California
Carrasquillo et al v. Upton et al
as 1:2009cv00817
Plaintiff:
Eddie Carrasquillo, Fabian Towers, Christopher Bush and others
Defendant:
Jody R. Upton, Gerardo Maldonado, Jr., Joyce Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Watts v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2009cv01473
Petitioner:
James Watts
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hedgepeth v. Village of Goshen et al
as 7:2009cv07280
Plaintiff:
Ella Mae Hedgepeth, Ella Mae Hedgepeth, Ella Mae Hedgepeth and others
Defendant:
Village of Goshen and James Watt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hedgepath v. Village of Goshen et al
as 1:2009cv07280
Plaintiff:
Ella Mae Hedgepath
Defendant:
Village of Goshen and James Watt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv61927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
WATTS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv80885
Plaintiff:
JAMES WATTS
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
