Cases 21 - 30 of 20,501
Tocker-Rose v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03447
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tocker-Rose
Defendant:
City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard Kaul v. James Oetken
as 24-1417
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, MD, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
JAMES PAUL OETKEN, in his personal and official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-40336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Patterson v. Orange County et al
as 7:2024cv03554
Plaintiff:
Franeisha Patterson
Defendant:
Orange County, ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Woodstock et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03418
Plaintiff:
Shahid Woodstock, Jahiem Smith and Tiffanie Narinesammy
Defendant:
The City of New York, Mayor of the City of New York Eric Adams, Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Philip Banks III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valentine-Williams v. City of Omaha, Nebraska
as 8:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
LaWanda J. Valentine-Williams
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Nebraska and Jane and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DOE v. MILLER et al
as 2:2024cv02019
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
MICHAEL MILLER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
