Cases 11 - 20 of 153
DOE 4 et al v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 4 and JANE DOE 8
Defendant:
SCOTTIE MAPLES, DAVID LOWE, MARK MEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
David Garcia
Defendant:
J Smith, . Durbin, Andrew Tilden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentz v. Manton et al
as 3:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
. Manton, . Huston, M Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Doe No 19-3251 v. Chier Intake Jonathan Gast, et al
as 23-55006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE NO 19-3251
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIER INTAKE JONATHAN GAST, FHEO, CITY OF LOS ANGELES and others
John Doe No 19-3251 v. Jonathan Gast et al
as 2:2022cv09273
Plaintiff:
John Doe No 19-3251
Defendant:
Chier Intake Jonathan Gast, FHEO, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shah El v. Frazier et al
as 3:2022cv50387
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
Makala Frazier, Brad Cars, Lance Reinbolz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe 8 v. Varsity Brands LLC et al
as 6:2022cv03508
Defendant:
Traevon Black, Varsity Brands LLC, Varsity Spirit LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 8
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company v. Natural Remedies Massage, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03578
Plaintiff:
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Natural Remedies Massage, LLC, Broad St Property LLC, Matthew Schaitel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Talpalar v. Tru Star Salon Services, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv21879
Plaintiff:
Sharon Talpalar
Defendant:
Tru Star Salon Services, LLC d/b/a Trustar Salon Services LLC, Goldwell of South Florida, Inc, Jeffrey Evan Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
