Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Moore v. Knox County et al (TWP1)
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
Christian Gomez, Knox County, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowe v. Pounders et al
as 2:2018cv02885
Defendant:
AWO Jones, Nurse Practitioners (2), Core Civic and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Neal Crowe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Michigan State University
as 1:2018cv00887
Defendant:
Gary Stollak, Michigan State University, Lawrence Gerard Nassar and others
Plaintiff:
Suma Cherukuri, Sarah Allen, Jaclyn Charters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dotson v. Fayette County Board of Education et al
as 2:2018cv02088
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dotson
Defendant:
Fayette County Board of Education , Marlon King , Nekita Johnson and others
Miscellaneou:
Ed Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robert Mayer v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
as 16-2217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MAYER
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and TROTT LAW, P.C.
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-15 and JOHN AND JANE DOES CORPORATIONS 1-5
Barnett v. Laurel County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Robert Herald Barnett
Defendant:
Laurel County, Kentucky, Laurel County Sheriff's Department, John Root and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatfield v. Braclaire Management LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
Randall Hatfield
Defendant:
Braclaire Management LLC, John Doe Company, Corporation, or Other Entity and John and Jane Doe Individuals 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
