Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Adams et al v. Carsey et al
as 3:2021cv00614
Plaintiff: Marvin H., Minetta N., Andrea M. and others
Defendant: Bill Cosby, Bill Cosby Productions, Marcia Carsey and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
HUBAY et al v. MENDEZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01327
Defendant: PAMELA HEAL, MILITARY SEXUAL TRAUMA MOVEMENT and JANELLE MARINA MENDEZ
Plaintiff: ALEXIS GABRIELLE HERRICK, ROBERT LOSIENIECKI, JESSICA DORANTES and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BRITT INTERACTIVE LLC et al v. A3 MEDIA LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02884
Third Party Plaintiff: A3 MEDIA LLC, A3 MEDIA LLC, A3 MEDIA LLC and others
Counter Claimant: A3 MEDIA LLC, A3 MEDIA LLC, A3 MEDIA LLC and others
Defendant: A3 MEDIA LLC, CHILLY PANDA MEDIA, LLC, COLLECTIVE PUBLISHING LLC and others
Third Party Defendant: JEANNE BRITT, JEANNE BRITT, JEANNE BRITT and others
Counter Defendant: JEANNE BRITT, TOM BRITT, BRITT INTERACTIVE LLC and others
Plaintiff: BRITT INTERACTIVE LLC, JOSHUA BROWN and TOWNEPOST NETWORK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MacKay v. Crews
as 14-1566
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
MacKay v. Crews
as 14-836
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
MacKay v. Crews
as 13-4140
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
Chanel, Inc. v. Janelle et al
as 1:2013cv02790
Plaintiff: Chanel, Inc.
Defendant: Sarah Janelle and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
MacKay v. Crew
as 12-5039
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
Fatal Clothing LLC v. Janel Rizo et al
as 2:2012cv10274
Defendant: Dangerously Dolly, Does and Janel Rizo
Plaintiff: Fatal Clothing LLC
Richline Group, Inc. et al v. Samuels Jewelers, Inc.
as 0:2012cv02427
Plaintiff: Richline Group, Inc. and Janel Russell Designs, Inc.
Defendant: Samuels Jewelers, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?