Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sprouse v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Ruben T. Sprouse
Defendant:
Miria Mitchell, Melissa Coburn, Ricky Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MDKC, LLC et al v City of Kansas City, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
MDKC LLC, OZMD LLC, Megan Duma and others
Defendant:
City of Kansas City, Missouri, Neighborhood Services Division of Kansas City and Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Kansas City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NEWMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20697
Plaintiff:
DAVID JASON NEWMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01055
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
NEWMAN et al v. ESTATE OF ROSE NEWMAN et al
as 2:2010cv04625
Plaintiff:
ZAREK NEWMAN, JASON NEWMAN, MARISSA NEWMAN and others
Defendant:
ESTATE OF ROSE NEWMAN, JACKIE AND SANDY REALTY INC. and JACK NEWMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Newman et al v. Banens Trailers
as 5:2009cv00573
Plaintiff:
Suzanne J. Newman, Lauren Newman Terrell, Jason Newman and others
Defendant:
Banens Trailers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
