Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Rossi v. Fisher
as 14-1720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randolph Rossi
Defendant - Appellee:
Commissioner Brian Fisher, and or his successor, Catherine Jacobsen, Acting Deputy Commissioner for Program Services, and or h/her successor, Director Mark Leonard, of Ministerial, Family and Volunteer Services, and or his successor and others
Torres v. Fischer et al
as 1:2013cv00828
Plaintiff:
Hector Luis Torres
Defendant:
Brain Fischer, Jeff McCoy, Martuscello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weathers v. Rock et al
as 9:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Albert Weathers
Defendant:
David Rock, Donald Uhler, Rabbi Heller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Abbott et al
as 1:2012cv00540
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Stephen Ables, All Agents and employees of The State of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Dale Ross
830) 896-8980 (fax:
Pat Tinley
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Tevores Wade v. Romon Robertson
as 09-7733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEVORES WADE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROMON ROBERTSON, PFC, ANTHONY TAORMINA, PFC, DANIEL GRIFFITH, PFC and others
Clarence Spinks v. Jay Morris, et al
as 09-5755
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE EDWARD SPINKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAY MORRIS, JAMES WILSON, SCOTT DEAVERS and others
Wade v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 1:2008cv01339
Plaintiff:
Tavares Wade
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Virginia, Fairfax County Police Department, David M. Rohrer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Spinks v. Morris et al
as 1:2007cv01226
Plaintiff:
Clarence Edward Spinks
Defendant:
Jay Morris, James Wilson, Scott Deavers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamont v. McCoy
as 9:2007cv00762
Petitioner:
Henri Lamont
Respondent:
Jeff McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
