Cases 1 - 10 of 16
COUNTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. HUGHES et al
as 2:2023cv02063
Plaintiff:
COUNTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CAITLIN HUGHES, JEFFERY HUGHES, SONNET ROBERTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
HUGHES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv50088
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. West et al
as 1:2020cv01980
Petitioner:
Michael Carter
Respondent:
Jeffery Hughes, Thomas Hitty and Salisbury Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Hitty et al
as 1:2020cv01337
Defendant:
Cpl. Jeffery Hughes and Sgt. Thomas Hitty
Plaintiff:
Michael Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HUGHES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv74829
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilliam v. Burl et al
as 2:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gilliam, III
Defendant:
Danny Burl, Larie A Taylor, Justine M Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIXON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03352
Plaintiff:
JEFF NIXON , JOYCE NIXON , MICHELLE ANN ENIS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2012cv00090
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry May, Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Henderson
as 1:2008cv03790
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hughes
Defendant:
Thurman L. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hughes v. Henderson
as 1:2009cv01844
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hughes
Defendant:
Thurmon L. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
