Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06359
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Alonzo Graham v. Paul Schnell, et al
as 26-3280
Defendant:
Sgt. J. Hayes, in their official and individual capacities, R. Erdman, in their official and individual capacities, Lt. Bradly Steele, in their official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Jerome Graham
Fenning v. Minneapolis Police Department et al
as 0:2026cv04693
Defendant:
State of Minnesota Judicial System, Project for Pride and Living, Patricia A. Lingwall and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine Jean Fenning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cargill v. Warden Molis et al
as 0:2026cv04696
Defendant:
O'Brien, Jensen, Parent and others
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Y. Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Tennesen-Jensen
as 4:2026cv01852
Plaintiff:
Marco Dean
Defendant:
Clarice Tennesen-Jensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jensen v. United States of America
as 4:2026cv01801
Plaintiff:
Kitalena Jensen
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Cui et al v. Agua Fria Senior Living LP et al
as 2:2026mc00032
Plaintiff:
Ying Cui, Ding Fang, Linying Xu and others
Defendant:
Agua Fria Senior Living LP, Agua Fira Senior Living LLC, Mark Harnden and others
Respondent:
Peter T Jensen and The Jensen Law Firm PLLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Benson v. Doe
as 1:2026cv09107
Plaintiff:
Frederick C. Benson, Daniel Cabrera, Corbin Cabrera and others
Defendant:
J. Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1610 Juridictional Immunities of Foreign States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
