Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Armstrong v. Byrd et al
as 6:2022cv04208
Plaintiff:
Jerome Armstrong
Defendant:
Brandon Byrd, Vanessa Mitchell, Candice Jamison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jerome Armstrong v. Superintendent Laurel Highland, et al
as 20-1460
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HIGHLANDS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME ARMSTRONG
Armstrong v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00442
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jerome Armstrong
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Armstrong v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00897
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jerome Armstrong
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Armstrong v. People of the State of California
as 2:2018cv01810
Petitioner:
Anthony Jerome Armstrong
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ARMSTRONG v. LUTHER et al
as 3:2018cv00086
Petitioner:
JEROME ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
JAMEY P. LUTHER and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. Dunlap et al
as 8:2015cv05103
Plaintiff:
Darian Antonio Coleman
Defendant:
David Dunlap, Donnie Stonebreaker, Tony Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canzater v. Bittinger et al
as 0:2014cv03773
Plaintiff:
Jerry Canzater
Defendant:
E Bittinger, Jerome Armstrong, Dennis R Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littlejohn v. Ozmint et al
as 1:2010cv02332
Plaintiff:
Tron Manuel Littlejohn
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Dennis Patterson, Jimmy Sligh, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William McKinnedy, III v. Cecil Reynold
as 10-6456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CLAYTON MCKINNEDY, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CECIL REYNOLDS, Warden at Kershaw Correctional Institution and et al., ROBERT E. WARD, a/k/a Bob Ward, JON OZMINT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
