Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Rajan v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, et al
as 5:2024cv02536
Plaintiff:
Jerome Thomas Henry Rajan
Defendant:
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, a Utah corporation sole dba Deseret Transportation and Scott Glenn Beck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Thomas v. Booher et al
as 3:2024cv00630
Petitioner:
Jerome Thomas
Respondent:
Superintendent Booher, District Attorney of York County and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunbar v. City of New Haven et al
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Jerome T. Dunbar and Jerome Thomas Dunbar
Defendant:
City of New Haven, Wendy J. Mongillo and Stephen W. Whalen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Watkins
as 23-10702
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jerome Thomas Watkins
Watkins v. USA
as 4:2023cv00444
Petitioner:
Jerome Thomas Watkins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Thomas v. Shaw et al
as 7:2022cv00583
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jerome Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Shaw and Captain Sears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Waterman et al
as 7:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jerome Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
G.L. Waterman, Ryan Zaidema, Mary Jane Dolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Christian v. Sergeant Thomas
as 22-6587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY CHRISTIAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT JEROME THOMAS, OFFICER CARL CARBAUGH, LIEUTENANT LADEJA MASON and others
USA v. Watkins
as 22-10378
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jerome Thomas Watkins
Pittman v. Royal Trucking, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00648
Plaintiff:
Wayne Pittman
Defendant:
Royal Trucking, LLC, Clyde Gay and William Jerome Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
