Cases 41 - 50 of 4,112
(PC) Jesse Rangel v. Jason Dodson
as 2:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Jesse Rangel
Defendant:
Jason Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Allen Morrison v. Leanna Lundy
as 2:2024cv01850
Petitioner:
Jesse Allen Morrison
Respondent:
Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hedrick v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jesse Alan Hedrick
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch, Robert Darling, Jeremy Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Jesse et al
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Cain
Defendant:
Lt. Cayla Jesse, Ofc Cross, Ofc David Killop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camacho v. CNMI Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Babauta Camacho
Defendant:
CNMI Department of Corrections, LT. Benjamin Lizama and COIII Lianna Quitugua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00386
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hooks v. Matushak et al
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Franklin Hooks
Defendant:
Rachel Matushak, James A Elsinger, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrera #152559 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jesse Herrera
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Unknown Figueroa and Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Rangel v. Jason Dodson
as 2:2024cv01647
Plaintiff:
Jesse Rangel
Defendant:
Jason Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
