Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Perez v. Jester et al
as 4:2026cv00938
Plaintiff:
Lynette M Perez
Defendant:
Cole Jester, Tim Griffin, Sharon Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
MORELAND v. JESTER
as 5:2026cv00351
Petitioner:
RODERICK MORELAND
Respondent:
WARDEN TEKETA JESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. JESTER
as 5:2026cv00350
Plaintiff:
MARKIEE QUANTAS JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN TEKETA JESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ELLIS v. JESTER
as 2:2026cv00069
Petitioner:
Cainan Rasheem Ellis
Respondent:
Teketa Jester
Unknown:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ELLIS v. JESTER
as 5:2026cv00290
Petitioner:
CAINAN RASHEEM ELLIS
Respondent:
WARDEN TEKETA JESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
K.D. et al v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2026cv01432
Defendant:
Karen Brazeau, Robert Jester, Gary Lawhead and others
Plaintiff:
K.D., J.G., S.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Personal Injury
Desouze v. Duru
as 26-20353
Plaintiff:
Neville Ambrose Desouze
Defendant:
Chuckwudi Duru, Bam, Jester Unit Commissarary Officer, Nigerian Muslim Officers and others
Bryan Norris, et al v. Tim Griffin, et al
as 26-2274
Plaintiff:
Bryan Norris and Norris for Arkansas
Defendant:
Tim Griffin, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas and Cole Jester, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Arkansas
OLIVER v. JESTER
as 3:2026cv00074
Petitioner:
DAVIAE MASSIR OLIVER
Respondent:
WARDEN TEKETA JESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JESTERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv00839
Petitioner:
ERICA JESTERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
