Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Davis v. Gentry et al
as 4:2026cv04068
Plaintiff:
Wesley Jay Davis
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Chett Stubbs, Jesus Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04943
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02913
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00101
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01234
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chavez-Borja v. United States of America et al
as 3:2025cv00576
Plaintiff:
Jesus Chavez-Borja
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Childress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv01738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hooper v. Chavez, Jr. et al
as 4:2025cv00241
Plaintiff:
Jame L. Hooper
Defendant:
Jesus Chavez, Jr. doing business as Chavez Trucking and Juan Carlos Pizarro Corral
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
CHAVEZ ESPINOZA v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Respondent:
COLETTE PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Petitioner:
JESUS CHAVEZ ESPINOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
