Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kiley Arnez Carter Express Trust v. Riley et al
as 1:2021cv05301
Plaintiff:
Kiley Arnez Carter Express Trust
Defendant:
Joe Riley doing business as The Patriot Family Homes LLC GA, Robert J. Solomon, David R. Sweat and others
Brinson v. Jackson Hospital and Clinic, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00395
Defendant:
Jackson Hospital and Clinic, Inc., Joe Riley, Leah Pierce and others
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Brinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11112
Fields et al v. Nevels et al
as 1:2019cv00521
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Fields, Eric Jordan, Kyle Johnson and others
Defendant:
Corporal Sugar, Priscella, B Stitnicky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields et al v. Nevels et al
as 3:2019cv01139
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Fields, Eric Jordan, Kyle Johnson and others
Defendant:
Corporal Sugar, Priscella, B Stitnicky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v Nevels et al
as 2:2019cv00352
Defendant:
Todd Fleece, Corporal Sugar and Reggie Nevels
Plaintiff:
Joe Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone et al v. Nevels et al
as 1:2019cv00126
Plaintiff:
Kyle Smith, Joe Riley, Greg Robinson and others
Defendant:
CLU Screening, Ken Faulk, Reggie Nevels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Christopher Odom v. State of South Carolina
as 16-2121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, JASON KING, Public Defender, CHARLES PATRICK, Solicitor and others
Odom v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2016cv02674
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Jason King, Charles Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
