Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Smith, II v. Allen et al
as 6:2018cv00339
Defendant:
Ruth Blanton, Department of Human Services, David Blanton, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Smith, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00256
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00612
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stanley v. Smith et al
as 6:2016cv00264
Defendant:
Billy Joe Smith and David Westerfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birrell v. joe
as 2:2016at00835
Plaintiff:
David Wesley Birrell
Defendant:
joe smith joe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LAND v. SMITH et al
as 2:2015cv00124
Defendant:
STEVE FENWICK, TERRY JOE SMITH and SCOTT D. STOCKTON
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY LAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STWALLEY v. SMITH et al
as 2:2015cv00035
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE PUTNAM COUNTY SHERIFF and TERRY JOE SMITH
Plaintiff:
AMBER STWALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler et al v. North Little Rock, City of et al
as 4:2014cv00632
Plaintiff:
Koy Butler and Mary Beth Cravens
Defendant:
North Little Rock, City of and Joe Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Convent Corporation v. City of North Little Rock, et al
as 14-1912
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Convent Corporation, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
City of North Little Rock, Arkansas, a Municipal Corporation, Joe Smith, Mayor, Individually and in his offical capacity, Debi Ross, City Council Member, Individually and in her official capacity and others
Convent Corporation v. North Little Rock Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2013cv00259
Plaintiff:
Convent Corporation
Defendant:
North Little Rock Arkansas, City of , Joe Smith , Debi Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
