Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC. v. Ateto et al
as 7:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC.
Defendant:
Philip Ateto, Barkha Bhandari, Joel Davis and others
Gonzales et al. v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
Edward Gonzales, Kent Kilgore, Adam Plouse and others
Defendant:
The Ohio State Univesity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Davis v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
David Joel Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Joe Lopez and Eric Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis v. Officer Helms
as 4:2022cv00590
Plaintiff:
Joel Davis
Defendant:
Officer Helms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DAVIS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv45711
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL DAVIS JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv68776
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY JOEL DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Baird, et al v. BlackRock Institutional Trust, et al
as 20-80044
Petitioner:
LAUREN SLAYTON and CHARLES BAIRD, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the BlackRock Retirement Savings Plan
Respondent:
PHILIPPE MATSUMOTO, ANN MARIE PETACH, JEFFREY A. SMITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
