Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Nyah Tchami William et al v. AES Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv02326
Plaintiff:
Nyah Tchami William, Business Group 4, Business Group 2 and others
Defendant:
AES Sonel, Actis Capital LLP and AES Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henderson v. Williams
as 13-3949
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Henderson and Genevieve Henderson
Defendant - Appellee:
John Williams, John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe and others
Shoate et al v. Doe et al
as 4:2013cv00683
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Shoate, Jr. and Ruby E. Shoate
Defendant:
John 1 Doe, John 2 Doe, John 3 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dear v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv04488
Plaintiff:
Demiskic Dear
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv03558
Plaintiff:
William Sanchez
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Brown, Galan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherratt v. Utah Department of Corrections, et al
as 13-4061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY SHERRATT
Defendant - Appellee:
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UTAH STATE PRISON, UTAH CONTRACT ATTORNEYS and others
Robert Diggs v. Sheriff Jim Arnott, et al
as 13-1632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert O. Diggs
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheriff Jim Arnott, Administrator Tim Smith, Harold Bengsch and others
Shoemaker v. Merritt et al
as 6:2013cv03115
Plaintiff:
Walter C. Shoemaker
Defendant:
Wayne Merritt, John 1 Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Combs v. State Of Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
Chad Combs
Defendant:
State Of Illinois Department of Corrections, S A Godinez, Donald Gaetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boothe v. Price et al
as 6:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Boothe
Defendant:
FNU . Price, John/Jane Doe, Jane 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
