Cases 21 - 30 of 85
Steck et al v. DiNapoli et al
as 1:2019cv05015
Plaintiff:
Phillip G. Steck, Janet Longo-Abinanti, John T. Mcdonald III and others
Defendant:
Scott Stringer, Thomas P. DiNapoli, H. Carl Mccall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
McDonald v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
as 1:2018cv12570
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John W McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
as 1:2018cv12569
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John W McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Vengroff Williams, Inc.
as 0:2018cv62459
Plaintiff:
John J. McDonald
Defendant:
Vengroff Williams, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11401
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Romerito Lalucis v. Carillo et al
as 2:2017cv06500
Defendant:
I.S.U. Officer John Doe Carillo, I.S.U. Officer John Doe Carillo, John Doe Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Romerito Lalucis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDONALD et al v. WAGNER ELECTRIC CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv60028
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. MCDONALD and CLAIRE MCDONALD
Defendant:
WAGNER ELECTRIC CORP. and GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Outlaw
as 3:2016cv00800
Plaintiff:
John Edward McDonald
Defendant:
Timothy Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hunter v. Ridling et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
Chase Carmen Hunter
Defendant:
Jim L. Ridling, The Alabama Department of Insurance and John Fairley McDonald, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
McDonald v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2015cv01347
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Development Center Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John T McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
