Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Blackwell et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00078
Plaintiff:
John E Blackwell , Gloria Blackwell and Michael Blackwell
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Blackwell v. Panhandle Helicopter, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00387
Plaintiff:
John A. Blackwell
Defendant:
Panhandle Helicopter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv11890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Smith v. Auburn University, et al (MAG+)
as 2:2012cv00230
Plaintiff:
Peter James Smith
Defendant:
Auburn University, The Auburn University Board of Trustees, Raymond J. Harbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Greene v. Phipps et al
as 7:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
Joseph Donald Greene
Defendant:
James Phipps, Bradley Finch, Joshai Showalter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
John T. Blackwell v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
as PAE/2:08-CV-69157
Plaintiff:
John T. Blackwell
Defendant:
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
John T. Blackwell v. Zurn Industries, Inc.
as PAE/2:08-CV-63945
Plaintiff:
John T. Blackwell
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc.
BLACKWELL v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO.
as 2:2008cv69157
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. BLACKWELL
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BLACKWELL v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv63945
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. BLACKWELL and JOHN T. BLACKWELL
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Brown et al v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
as 3:2007cv00024
Plaintiff:
Freida Brown, Freida Brown, Freida Brown and others
Defendant:
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
