Cases 1 - 10 of 76
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., SLONG, K. FINKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John E Miller Jr v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv01639
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
John E Miller, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., OFFICER SLONG, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Clark et al
as 5:2024ct03043
Plaintiff:
John Frank Miller
Defendant:
Ms. Clark, Ms. Lee, Cpt. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Thomas Miller v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05660
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 3:2023cv05408
Plaintiff:
John E. Miller
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
McLaughlin et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv03302
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Brad McLaughlin, Terry Raymond McCall, Douglas Wayne McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Miller v. Wilson
as 5:2023ct03076
Plaintiff:
John Frank Miller
Defendant:
Ms. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haney v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv02954
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Haney
Defendant:
John Matthew Miller, Kimberly Miller, Jane Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
