Cases 1 - 10 of 1,118
United States Steel Corporation v. Summit Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
United States Steel Corporation
Defendant:
Summit Inc, Stone Transport LP, Load n Go Express LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Damages to Interstate Shipments by Motor Carriers
United States Steel Corporation v. Summit, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
United States Steel Corporation
Defendant:
Summit, Inc., Stone Transport, LP, Load n Go Express LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Damages to Interstate Shipments by Motor Carriers
Hlley v. Woolard et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Betsy S. Holley and John L. Smith
Defendant:
Elvanetta S. Woolard, Pamela Fleming, Taneisha W. Whitehurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ABC Company v. SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv02211
Petitioner:
ABC Company
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL SMITH and Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Landry v. Rhode Island State Police et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Defendant:
Ana Cristina Cola, Rhode Island State Police, Lt. R. Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Norman J. Landry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Sasser v. Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01869
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sasser
Defendant:
Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc., David Harris, Hannah Craven and others
Smith v. D.O.N. et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
John M. Smith
Defendant:
D.O.N., Bean, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beauregard, et al. v. Sampson, et al.
as 24-1324
Plaintiff:
MARY JANE BEAUREGARD and JOHN HUGH SMITH
Defendant:
CLAYTON SAMPSON, ELISHA SAMPSON, ENVYTV, LLC and others
Dingler v. Wayborn
as 24-10183
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler
Defendant:
Bill Wayborn, Tarrant County Sheriff, Texas Commission on Jail Standards, Tarrant County Hospital District, doing business as John Peter Smith Health Network and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
