Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Cummins-Reed v. Eppes et al
as 1:2019cv01463
Defendant:
Ms. T. Eppes and Jason Wilson
Plaintiff:
John Cummins-Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Girod v. Morton et al
as 3:2015cv02331
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Girod, Jr
Defendant:
Gabriel Morton, Kevin Wyles and John Cummins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Lawson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00197
Plaintiff:
Willie Montgomery
Defendant:
Ms. Lawson, John Cummins, Warden Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin v. Thomas et al
as 2:2011cv00796
Plaintiff:
Mark Melvin
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Richard Allen , Bobby Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallworth v. Cummins et al
as 1:2011cv00188
Petitioner:
Kinwen LaMarrow Stallworth
Respondent:
John Cummins and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stallworth v. Cummins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00172
Plaintiff:
Kinwen LaMarrow Stallworth
Defendant:
John Cummins and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayes v. Alabama Department of Corrections Commissioner et al (INMATE 1) (LEAD CASE)
as 2:2011cv00038
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Hayes
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections Commissioner , John Cummins , Capt. Napier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Inge v. Morgan et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00993
Plaintiff:
Derrick Inge
Defendant:
Bonnie Morgan, Officer Barnes and John Cummins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. State of Alabama, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00766
Plaintiff:
Cesar Moss
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Department of Corrections, Richard F. Allen, Arnold Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rico Mccoy v. State of Alabama DOC, et al
as 10-13889
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICO R. MCCOY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICHARD F. ALLEN, JOHN CUMMINS, II, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
