Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Sasser v. Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01869
Plaintiff: Andrew Sasser
Defendant: Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc., David Harris, Hannah Craven and others
John Smith v. Donnie Ames
as 23-6786
Petitioner / Appellant: JOHN D. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee: DONNIE AMES, Superintendent
SMITH v. WEDDELL
as 1:2023cv00989
Plaintiff: JOHN D. SMITH, II
Defendant: BRANDON WEDDELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. HAMBLEN et al
as 1:2023cv00930
Plaintiff: JOHN D. SMITH, II
Defendant: LISA HAMBLEN, ARYANNA MOSS, LAURA YOUNGSTAFEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv00906
Petitioner: JOHN D. SMITH, II
Respondent: DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johansen et al v. Myers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00006
Counter Defendant: Lance Johansen and Mississippi Orthopedic Institute, PLLC
Defendant: Phillip Myers, Paula Smith, John D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Smith v. Ames
as 5:2022cv00235
Petitioner: John D. Smith
Respondent: Donnie Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv02862
Defendant: 3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff: John D Smith and Christina Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SMITH v. WEDDLE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02590
Plaintiff: JOHN D. SMITH
Defendant: B. WEDDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02368
Plaintiff: JOHN D. SMITH
Defendant: WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, SHERRI WILSON, KIM CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?