Cases 31 - 40 of 41
McCarthy v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Joseph McCarthy
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien, John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chattams v. Rossi et al
as 1:2012cv00666
Plaintiff:
D'Anthony Lamar Chattams
Defendant:
Glenn Rossi, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, Reginald Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlos Anthony Miranda v. Lowbonski et al
as 2:2011cv00162
Defendant:
John Doe I, John Doe II, John Doe III and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Anthony Miranda
Ferrell v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2010cv03515
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Ferrell
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Georgia Department of Corrections, Phillips State Prison Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coates v. Doe I et al
as 1:2010cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Coates
Defendant:
John Doe I, John Doe II, John Doe III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hammond v. Doe et al
as 3:2010cv00364
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel David Hammond
Defendant:
John Doe, I, John Doe, II, John Doe, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schlicher v. McNeil et al
as 3:2009cv00489
Plaintiff:
Gregory H. Schlicher
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil, Page A. Smith, John Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schlicher v. McNeal et al
as 3:2009cv00381
Plaintiff:
Gregory H. Schlicher
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeal, Page A. Smith, John Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Chief Medical Officer et al
as 2:2008cv00703
Plaintiff:
Edward Taylor
Defendant:
John Doe I, Chief Medical Officer, Corrections Medical Center, Deb Timmerman-Cooper, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CORTEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv02657
Plaintiff:
WILFREDO CORTEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOSEPH COONEY, EDWARD HAYS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
