Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Liu v. New York State Department of H
as 18-964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiao Qing Liu
Defendant - Appellee:
Matthew DeCagna, Doctor Abigail Hawkins, Doctor Sunil Penesti and others
Defendant:
William F. Ryan Community Health Center, NENA, Fedex Corporation, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation and others
Crosby v. San Diego Police Dept. et al
as 3:2016cv01309
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Crosby
Defendant:
San Diego Police Dept., John Doe Police Officers, 3, San Diego, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stiriling et al v. St. Louis County Police Department et al
as 4:2012cv02279
Plaintiff:
Jamison Stiriling and Thomas Knibb
Defendant:
St. Louis County Police Department, Robert Rinck, Steven Schue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Schweiloch et al
as 1:2012cv03253
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Michael MacDougal, Wilfredo Vega, Sandra Quinones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowe v. City of Kent et al
as 5:2009cv02583
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin Crowe
Defendant:
City of Kent, James Prusha, John Doe Police Officer No. #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shaffer v. City of North Olmsted et al
as 1:2009cv01173
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Shaffer
Defendant:
City of North Olmsted, North Olmsted Police Department, John Doe Police Officer #1 and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
KING v. WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2009cv02118
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KING
Defendant:
WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY, JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICER #1, JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICER #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
TOWNSEND v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv02117
Plaintiff:
ERNEST O. TOWNSEND
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, J. WOLF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
