Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Brant v. Smeal et al
as 3:2009cv02410
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Brant
Defendant:
Paul K. Smeal, James W. Fouse, Jr., Medical Department/Staff for State Correctional Inst. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGee v. People of The State of California
as 2:2009cv03184
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald McGee
Respondent:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Douglas Fitzgerald
as 09-35240
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DOUGLAS JOHN FITZGERALD
US v. John Jackson
as 09-6545
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN FITZGERALD JACKSON
John Johnson v. Richard Bazzle
as 09-6414
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN FITZGERALD JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD E. BAZZLE, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution
Henderson v. Beverly et al
as 6:2008cv01797
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Henderson, Sr.
Defendant:
Norman Beverly and Greg Futch
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Korsko v. Murphy et al
as 1:2008cv00380
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Korsko
Defendant:
Darren N. Murphy and Kelly L. McKenney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Korsko v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
as 1:2008cv00379
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Korsko
Defendant:
Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MALARIK v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2008cv00576
Petitioner:
JAMES M. MALARIK
Respondent:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, KATIE WEEKS, JOHN FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens #397191 v. Curtis
as 1:2008cv00084
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald Stevens #397191
Respondent:
Bruce Curtis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
