Cases 1 - 10 of 288
FLYNN v. SHELL CHEMICAL APPALACHIA, LLC
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLYNN
Defendant:
SHELL CHEMICAL APPALACHIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Cremen v. Tarantino et al
as 1:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
Michael Cremen
Defendant:
Daniel Tarantino, Aaron Besecher, Michael Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flynn v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
John Flynn
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Eckert v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2022cv00540
Plaintiff:
Rachel Eckert
Defendant:
City of Buffalo, County of Erie, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruiz v. Flynn
as 21-2616
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Ruiz, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Hon. Kenneth F. Case, D.A.. John Flynn, Sheriff Timothy B. Howard and others
Diaz v. State of Rhode Island et al.
as 1:2021cv00411
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Diaz
Defendant:
Attorney General Peter F. Neronha, Superior Court Mag. Richard Rospallo, Defense Attorney Thomas Gulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arlotta v. His Holiness Pope Francis
as 21-1457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Paul Arlotta
Defendant / Appellee:
John Flynn, Erie County NY District Attorney and His Holiness Pope Francis
Ruiz v. Flynn et al
as 6:2021cv06435
Respondent:
Sheriff Timothy B. Howard, Hon. Kenneth F. Case and D.A. John Flynn
Petitioner:
Jose Ruiz, Jr.
Defendant:
A.G. Letita James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Diaz v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2021cv00208
Defendant:
David Curtin, Maureen B Keough, Judy Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arlotta v. His Holiness Pope Francis et al
as 1:2021cv00536
Plaintiff:
James Paul Arlotta
Defendant:
John Flynn and His Holiness Pope Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
