Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01430
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Schaefer v. Hartnett
as 1:2023cv00260
Plaintiff: Kenneth Schaefer
Defendant: John Hartnett
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00641
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01610
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Okyere v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2022cv00990
Plaintiff: Jeffery Okyere
Defendant: Merrick Garland, John Hartnett, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01336
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00630
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hartnett v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00939
Defendant: Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Plaintiff: John Hartnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Vishnu Meda v. John Hartnett
as 17-60286
Petitioner - Appellant: VISHNU PRADEEP MEDA
Respondent - Appellee: JOHN HARTNETT, Warden, LaSalle Detention Facility
Marjan Rroku v. David Cole, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-31074
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARJAN RROKU
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID C. COLE, HENRY WOODS and JOHN HARTNETT, Assistant Field Officer Director on behalf of Immigration & Customs Enforcement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?