Cases 41 - 50 of 313
Shawn Rhoades v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC
as 21-2381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN PHILLIP RHOADES, JOSEPH FRANKLIN DENNIS, JOSHUA MARSHALL FLOYD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, LLC
TRUDEL v. DILMORE et al
as 1:2021cv03162
Defendant:
HUGH DAVID O'DONNELL, WYNN ANDREW HARDING, PHYLLIS ARMATROUT WONG and others
Plaintiff:
MARY TRUDEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whatley et al v. Stephens et al
as 1:2021cv00549
Plaintiff:
John Mark Whatley, Travis Carpenter and Derrick W. Holloway
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, FNU Minter, FNU Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhoades et al Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC
as 1:2021cv03391
Plaintiff:
Shawn Phillip Rhoades, Joseph Franklin Dennis, Joshua Marshall Floyd and others
Defendant:
Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PEACOCK et al v. HUDSON CORPORATION DBA HUDSON INSURANCE GROUP A KANSAS CORPORATION
as 3:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
ETHAN PEACOCK, MARK PEACOCK, CAROL PEACOCK and others
Defendant:
HUDSON CORPORATION DBA HUDSON INSURANCE GROUP A KANSAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
LESHOVSKY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43977
Plaintiff:
JOHN MARK LESHOVSKY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. Denver County Jail Medical Department
as 1:2021cv02226
Plaintiff:
John Mark Hernandez
Defendant:
Denver County Jail Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Chan's Frame and Body Shop, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00033
Plaintiff:
Dylan Murray
Defendant:
Chan's Frame and Body Shop, LLC, John Mark Roberts, Casey Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neo4j, Inc., et al v. PureThink, LLC, et al
as 21-16029
Counter Claimant:
IGOV, INC., PURETHINK, LLC and JOHN MARK SUHY
Plaintiff:
NEO4J SWEDEN AB and NEO4J, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
