Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hugger v. Aramark Campus LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hugger
Defendant:
Aramark Campus LLC and John Pickett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Andrew Flemmings v. Yash Patel et al
as 2:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Andrew Flemmings
Defendant:
Yash Patel, David Barr, Andrew Bremer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrew Flemmings v. Yash Patel et al
as 8:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Andrew Flemmings
Defendant:
Yash Patel, David Barr, Andrew Bremer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2023cv04061
Plaintiff:
Randy Ellis Williams
Defendant:
Public Defender Jason Mitchell, Public Defender John Pickett and Prosecuting Attorney David P. Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2022cv81410
Plaintiff:
John Pickett
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. and GlaxoSmithkline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Petrizzo v. Pickett
as 4:2021cv00246
Defendant:
Jeffery John Pickett
Plaintiff:
Michael Aldo Petrizzo, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PICKETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv50393
Plaintiff:
JOHN PICKETT
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pickett v. Stutts
as 2:2014cv00277
Petitioner:
Dorel John Pickett, Jr.
Respondent:
J. B. Stutts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cedrick Mhoon v. Jeremy Disotell, et al
as 14-1264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cedrick Mhoon
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremy Disotell, Patrolman, Conway Police Department, Brian A. Busby, Patrolman, Conway Police Department, T. G. Cooper, Patrolman, Conway Police Department and others
Mhoon v. Disotell et al
as 4:2011cv00253
Plaintiff:
Cedrick Mhoon
Defendant:
Jeremy Disotell, Brian A Busby, T G Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
